Tachyons
There was a young lady named Bright, Whose speed was far faster than light.
She went out one day, In a relative way,
And returned the previous night!
-Reginald Buller
It is a well known fact that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. At best, a massless particle travels at the speed of light.
But is this really true?
In 1962, Bilaniuk, Deshpande, and Sudarshan, Am. J. Phys. 30, 718 (1962), said
"no".
"no".
A very readable paper is Bilaniuk and Sudarshan, Phys. Today 22,43 (1969). I give here a brief overview.
Draw a graph, with momentum (p) on the x-axis, and energy (E) on the y-axis. Then draw the "light cone", two lines
with the equations E = +/- p. This divides our 1+1 dimensional space-time into two regions. Above and below are the
"timelike" quadrants, and to the left and right are the "spacelike" quadrants.
Now the fundamental fact of relativity is that E2 - p2 = m2. (Let's take c=1 for the rest of the discussion.) For any nonzero
value of m (mass), this is a hyperbola with branches in the timelike regions. It passes through the point (p,E) =
(0,m), where the particle is at rest. Any particle with mass m is constrained to move on the upper branch of this
hyperbola. (Otherwise, it is "off-shell", a term you hear in association with virtual particles - but that's another topic.)
For massless particles, E2 = p2, and the particle moves on the light-cone.
These two cases are given the names tardyon (or bradyon in more modern usage) and luxon, for "slow particle" and
"light particle". Tachyon is the name given to the supposed "fast particle" which would move with v>c. (Tachyons
were first introduced into physics by Gerald Feinberg, in his seminal paper "On the possibility of faster-than-light
particles" [Phys.Rev. v.159, pp.1089--1105 (1967)]).
Now another familiar relativistic equation is E = m*[1-(v/c)2]-1/2. Tachyons (if they exist) have v > c. This means that
E is imaginary! Well, what if we take the rest mass m, and take it to be imaginary? Then E is negative real, and E2 -
p2 = m2 < 0. Or, p2 - E2 = M2, where M is real. This is a hyperbola with branches in the spacelike region of
spacetime. The energy and momentum of a tachyon must satisfy this relation.
You can now deduce many interesting properties of tachyons. For example, they accelerate (p goes up) if they lose
energy (E goes down). Furthermore, a zero-energy tachyon is "transcendent", or infinitely fast. This has profound
consequences. For example, let's say that there were electrically charged tachyons. Since they would move faster than
the speed of light in the vacuum, they should produce Cherenkov radiation. This would lower their energy, causing
them to accelerate more! In other words, charged tachyons would probably lead to a runaway reaction releasing an
arbitrarily large amount of energy. This suggests that coming up with a sensible theory of anything except free
(noninteracting) tachyons is likely to be difficult. Heuristically, the problem is that we can get spontaneous creation of
tachyon-antitachyon pairs, then do a runaway reaction, making the vacuum unstable. To treat this precisely requires
quantum field theory, which gets complicated. It is not easy to summarize results here. However, one reasonably
modern reference is Tachyons, Monopoles, and Related Topics, E. Recami, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978).
However, tachyons are not entirely invisible. You can imagine that you might produce them in some exotic nuclear
reaction. If they are charged, you could "see" them by detecting the Cherenkov light they produce as they speed away
faster and faster. Such experiments have been done. So far, no tachyons have been found. Even neutral tachyons can
scatter off normal matter with experimentally observable consequences. Again, no such tachyons have been found.
How about using tachyons to transmit information faster than the speed of light, in violation of Special Relativity? It's
worth noting that when one considers the relativistic quantum mechanics of tachyons, the question of whether they
"really" go faster than the speed of light becomes much more touchy! In this framework, tachyons are waves that
satisfy a wave equation. Let's treat free tachyons of spin zero, for simplicity. We'll set c = 1 to keep things less messy.
The wavefunction of a single such tachyon can be expected to satisfy the usual equation for spin-zero particles, the
Klein-Gordon equation:
(BOX + m2)phi = 0
where BOX is the D'Alembertian, which in 3+1 dimensions is just
BOX = (d/dt)2 - (d/dx)2 - (d/dy)2 - (d/dz)2.
The difference with tachyons is that m2 is negative, and m is imaginary.
To simplify the math a bit, let's work in 1+1 dimensions, with co-ordinates x and t, so that
BOX = (d/dt)2 - (d/dx)2
Everything we'll say generalizes to the real-world 3+1-dimensional case. Now - regardless of m, any solution is a
linear combination, or superposition, of solutions of the form
phi(t,x) = exp(-iEt + ipx)
where E2 - p2 = m2. When m2 is negative there are two essentially different cases. Either |p| >= |E|, in which case E is
real and we get solutions that look like waves whose crests move along at the rate |p|/|E| >= 1, i.e., no slower than the
speed of light. Or |p| < |E|, in which case E is imaginary and we get solutions that look waves that amplify
exponentially as time passes!
We can decide as we please whether or not we want to consider the second sort of solutions. They seem weird, but
then the whole business is weird, after all.
1) If we do permit the second sort of solution, we can solve the Klein-Gordon equation with any reasonable initial data
- that is, any reasonable values of phi and its first time derivative at t = 0. (For the precise definition of "reasonable",
consult your local mathematician.) This is typical of wave equations. And, also typical of wave equations, we can
prove the following thing: If the solution phi and its time derivative are zero outside the interval [-L,L] when t = 0, they
will be zero outside the interval [-L-|t|, L+|t|] at any time t. In other words, localized disturbances do not spread with
speed faster than the speed of light! This seems to go against our notion that tachyons move faster than the speed of
light, but it's a mathematical fact, known as "unit propagation velocity".
2) If we don't permit the second sort of solution, we can't solve the Klein-Gordon equation for all reasonable initial
data, but only for initial data whose Fourier transforms vanish in the interval [-|m|,|m|]. By the Paley-Wiener theorem
this has an odd consequence: it becomes impossible to solve the equation for initial data that vanish outside some
interval [-L,L]! In other words, we can no longer "localize" our tachyon in any bounded region in the first place, so it
becomes impossible to decide whether or not there is "unit propagation velocity" in the precise sense of part 1). Of
course, the crests of the waves exp(-iEt + ipx) move faster than the speed of light, but these waves were never localized
in the first place!
The bottom line is that you can't use tachyons to send information faster than the speed of light from one place to
another. Doing so would require creating a message encoded some way in a localized tachyon field, and sending it off
at superluminal speed toward the intended receiver. But as we have seen you can't have it both ways: localized tachyon
disturbances are subluminal and superluminal disturbances are nonlocal.
Draw a graph, with momentum (p) on the x-axis, and energy (E) on the y-axis. Then draw the "light cone", two lines
with the equations E = +/- p. This divides our 1+1 dimensional space-time into two regions. Above and below are the
"timelike" quadrants, and to the left and right are the "spacelike" quadrants.
Now the fundamental fact of relativity is that E2 - p2 = m2. (Let's take c=1 for the rest of the discussion.) For any nonzero
value of m (mass), this is a hyperbola with branches in the timelike regions. It passes through the point (p,E) =
(0,m), where the particle is at rest. Any particle with mass m is constrained to move on the upper branch of this
hyperbola. (Otherwise, it is "off-shell", a term you hear in association with virtual particles - but that's another topic.)
For massless particles, E2 = p2, and the particle moves on the light-cone.
These two cases are given the names tardyon (or bradyon in more modern usage) and luxon, for "slow particle" and
"light particle". Tachyon is the name given to the supposed "fast particle" which would move with v>c. (Tachyons
were first introduced into physics by Gerald Feinberg, in his seminal paper "On the possibility of faster-than-light
particles" [Phys.Rev. v.159, pp.1089--1105 (1967)]).
Now another familiar relativistic equation is E = m*[1-(v/c)2]-1/2. Tachyons (if they exist) have v > c. This means that
E is imaginary! Well, what if we take the rest mass m, and take it to be imaginary? Then E is negative real, and E2 -
p2 = m2 < 0. Or, p2 - E2 = M2, where M is real. This is a hyperbola with branches in the spacelike region of
spacetime. The energy and momentum of a tachyon must satisfy this relation.
You can now deduce many interesting properties of tachyons. For example, they accelerate (p goes up) if they lose
energy (E goes down). Furthermore, a zero-energy tachyon is "transcendent", or infinitely fast. This has profound
consequences. For example, let's say that there were electrically charged tachyons. Since they would move faster than
the speed of light in the vacuum, they should produce Cherenkov radiation. This would lower their energy, causing
them to accelerate more! In other words, charged tachyons would probably lead to a runaway reaction releasing an
arbitrarily large amount of energy. This suggests that coming up with a sensible theory of anything except free
(noninteracting) tachyons is likely to be difficult. Heuristically, the problem is that we can get spontaneous creation of
tachyon-antitachyon pairs, then do a runaway reaction, making the vacuum unstable. To treat this precisely requires
quantum field theory, which gets complicated. It is not easy to summarize results here. However, one reasonably
modern reference is Tachyons, Monopoles, and Related Topics, E. Recami, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978).
However, tachyons are not entirely invisible. You can imagine that you might produce them in some exotic nuclear
reaction. If they are charged, you could "see" them by detecting the Cherenkov light they produce as they speed away
faster and faster. Such experiments have been done. So far, no tachyons have been found. Even neutral tachyons can
scatter off normal matter with experimentally observable consequences. Again, no such tachyons have been found.
How about using tachyons to transmit information faster than the speed of light, in violation of Special Relativity? It's
worth noting that when one considers the relativistic quantum mechanics of tachyons, the question of whether they
"really" go faster than the speed of light becomes much more touchy! In this framework, tachyons are waves that
satisfy a wave equation. Let's treat free tachyons of spin zero, for simplicity. We'll set c = 1 to keep things less messy.
The wavefunction of a single such tachyon can be expected to satisfy the usual equation for spin-zero particles, the
Klein-Gordon equation:
(BOX + m2)phi = 0
where BOX is the D'Alembertian, which in 3+1 dimensions is just
BOX = (d/dt)2 - (d/dx)2 - (d/dy)2 - (d/dz)2.
The difference with tachyons is that m2 is negative, and m is imaginary.
To simplify the math a bit, let's work in 1+1 dimensions, with co-ordinates x and t, so that
BOX = (d/dt)2 - (d/dx)2
Everything we'll say generalizes to the real-world 3+1-dimensional case. Now - regardless of m, any solution is a
linear combination, or superposition, of solutions of the form
phi(t,x) = exp(-iEt + ipx)
where E2 - p2 = m2. When m2 is negative there are two essentially different cases. Either |p| >= |E|, in which case E is
real and we get solutions that look like waves whose crests move along at the rate |p|/|E| >= 1, i.e., no slower than the
speed of light. Or |p| < |E|, in which case E is imaginary and we get solutions that look waves that amplify
exponentially as time passes!
We can decide as we please whether or not we want to consider the second sort of solutions. They seem weird, but
then the whole business is weird, after all.
1) If we do permit the second sort of solution, we can solve the Klein-Gordon equation with any reasonable initial data
- that is, any reasonable values of phi and its first time derivative at t = 0. (For the precise definition of "reasonable",
consult your local mathematician.) This is typical of wave equations. And, also typical of wave equations, we can
prove the following thing: If the solution phi and its time derivative are zero outside the interval [-L,L] when t = 0, they
will be zero outside the interval [-L-|t|, L+|t|] at any time t. In other words, localized disturbances do not spread with
speed faster than the speed of light! This seems to go against our notion that tachyons move faster than the speed of
light, but it's a mathematical fact, known as "unit propagation velocity".
2) If we don't permit the second sort of solution, we can't solve the Klein-Gordon equation for all reasonable initial
data, but only for initial data whose Fourier transforms vanish in the interval [-|m|,|m|]. By the Paley-Wiener theorem
this has an odd consequence: it becomes impossible to solve the equation for initial data that vanish outside some
interval [-L,L]! In other words, we can no longer "localize" our tachyon in any bounded region in the first place, so it
becomes impossible to decide whether or not there is "unit propagation velocity" in the precise sense of part 1). Of
course, the crests of the waves exp(-iEt + ipx) move faster than the speed of light, but these waves were never localized
in the first place!
The bottom line is that you can't use tachyons to send information faster than the speed of light from one place to
another. Doing so would require creating a message encoded some way in a localized tachyon field, and sending it off
at superluminal speed toward the intended receiver. But as we have seen you can't have it both ways: localized tachyon
disturbances are subluminal and superluminal disturbances are nonlocal.
No comments:
Post a Comment